The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics: An opportunity to promote physical activity and winter sports in Chinese youth (2024)

  • Journal List
  • J Sport Health Sci
  • v.11(1); 2022 Jan
  • PMC8847916

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics: An opportunity to promote physical activity and winter sports in Chinese youth (1)

Link to Publisher's site

J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Jan; 11(1): 3–5.

Published online 2021 Sep 20. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.09.005

PMCID: PMC8847916

PMID: 34547481

Barbara E. Ainswortha,b, and James F. Sallisc,d

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

In February and March 2022, China will host the Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. The vision for this landmark event promises a “joyful rendezvous upon pure ice and snow uniting the passion of hundreds of millions for winter sports”.1 Themes have been developed to create a positive environmental impact with new development for the northern region of the country and to promote winter sports and improve the health and well-being of the Chinese people. The key messages for the winter games include inspiring youth with the Olympic spirit and encouraging millions to embrace winter sports. Notably, the Chinese government aims to mobilize at least 300 million of its citizens to engage in winter sports as an outcome of hosting the Winter Olympic Games.1

In line with Beijing's vision of engaging 300 million people in winter sports in China, education of the youth population and encouraging sustainable development of physical health figure prominently in planning for the 2022 Winter Olympics. For example, plans have been made to establish hundreds of Olympic and Paralympic Education Demonstration Schools. Goals have been set to expand winter sports programming into the primary and middle school curriculum and to incorporate Olympic-related educational activities into schools by organizing student festivals and winter sports events for school-aged children. Other plans include promoting a nationwide fitness campaign and encouraging mass fitness and leisure activities to make exercise a part of everyone's daily routine.1

These theme plans highlight the importance of sport and physical activity, which play a powerful role in children's physical and emotional development.2, 3, 4 Youth who engage in regular physical activity have lower odds of engaging in risky behaviors, such as smoking, drugs, and unsafe sex.5,6 Active youth are less likely to be obese or to have premature chronic conditions.7 They are more likely to succeed in school, be more productive in their work activities,8 and have better life skills for managing emotions, resolving conflicts, helping others, and making good intentional decisions.9 Yet, according to a 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) school-based survey of 1.6 million students globally, nearly 81% of youth 11–17 years of age were insufficiently active, with fewer than 60 min per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. In China, the prevalence of insufficiently active youth was 84.3%, with girls being less active than boys.10 These prevalence estimates highlight the importance of developing and implementing school- and community-based mass participation initiatives that will increase levels of physical activity among youth.

Given the increasing popularity of sports11 and the health benefits2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 for youth who engage in regular physical activity, there are reasons to be optimistic that promoting sports could be a means of increasing physical activity among youthful populations. For example, a study found that organized team sports accounted for 23% to 60% of physical activity among U.S. youth,12 and another study found that boys were more active on days when they participated in sports.13 Organized sports provide a structure for regular participation,11 which may help to increase overall physical activity among children and youth.14,15 The American Academy of Pediatrics has long recommended youth sports as a means of increasing physical activity.11

However, there are also reasons to be skeptical about using youth sports as a physical activity-promotion strategy. One study using direct observation found that participants in youth sports spent 43% of their time being inactive.16 Another study of youth football (soccer) and baseball/softball practices using accelerometers similarly found that participants were inactive about half the time.17 There were wide differences across subgroups of participants. Girls were much less physically active than boys during baseball/softball practices, and older-age youth were less active than younger-age participants in both sports.17 For youth sports to make important contributions to youth physical activity, sports practices need to be designed to be active and to occur several times per week, young people need to participate in multiple sports to remain active throughout the year, and barriers related to cost and transportation to facilities have to be overcome.

Although there is much optimism that participation in sports can increase physical activity and provide other benefits, the evidence of health-related beneficial effects is limited. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) initiated Sport for All in 1983 by establishing a commission “to encourage and support the efforts of sharing the health and social benefits to be gained by all members of society through regular physical activity”.18 The initiative has been sustained by biannual conferences, guides for local program organizers, and support for annual programs in each IOC region.18 Working in collaboration with sports organizations to develop, scale, and share best practices for all programs and policies, the WHO has also incorporated the initiative into its Global Action Plan for Physical Activity (GAPPA).19 The WHO is also working with the IOC and organizers and stakeholders of major sporting events in many host countries and cities to fulfill the promised impact of increased physical activity as a legacy of their events.20 Unfortunately, evaluations of the impact of Sport for All on physical activity have not been made.

A recent report examined the impact of prior Olympics on physical activity and sport participation among the general population in host countries or cities.21 Although Sport for All began in 1983, Beijing's bid for the 2008 Summer Olympics was the first to mention establishing a legacy of enhancing public health through physical activity participation.1 Since then, all host cities of Summer Olympics have promised a physical-activity legacy, but Beijing's bid for the 2022 Winter Olympics has been the only winter games to specify physical activity legacy as a goal. For 6 Olympic Games, researchers were able to compare physical activity data collected in the host city before and after the Olympics. The Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics provided the only evidence of an Olympic legacy effect on physical activity, showing an increase in the prevalence of physical activity between 2001 (the time Beijing won the bid) and 2014.21 Such a pre-and-post Olympic change may be attributable to the comprehensive policies, guidelines, and programs implemented by the national government to promote mass participation in physical activity and sports across the country.21 Efforts, such as community sport facility construction, education campaigns, and community sporting events likely accounted for the observed increase in physical activity at the population level. No other host cities made comparable efforts or had comparable results. The positive results from Beijing 2008 indicate that it is possible for the Olympic Games to create a physical-activity legacy that benefits the entire population, not just elite athletes.

It is worth noting, however, that increased physical activity is not an automatic benefit of the Olympic Games. A study of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics showed no measurable impact on population physical activity and sport participation among Canadian children and adolescents from the pre- to the post-Olympic period (2007–2011).22 It seems that investments in sport facilities, cross-government communications and coordination, and community-wide physical activity promotion and Olympic education programs are required to produce a climate likely to cultivate an Olympic physical-activity legacy.

Nevertheless, encouraging evidence of sustained increases in population physical activity after the Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics and the Sustainability Plan1 of the Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, along with substantial economic, environmental, and social and education investments already made to date, provide reason for confidence that continued comprehensive efforts associated with the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics will result in further increases in winter sports participation and physical activity across China. Because the physical activity plan for the 2022 Winter Olympic Games targets youth, there is potential for a successful physical activity legacy, with particular benefits among school-aged children and adolescents, the majority of whom are insufficiently active or not meeting physical activity guidelines.10 Clearly, addressing youth physical inactivity is a global public health mission that requires coordinated efforts among Olympic planners, leaders from the sport community, public health agencies, and community stakeholders.11 In this regard, in the spirit of the Olympics, we recommend expanding strategies beyond those currently in place for promoting winter sports by including goals for increasing overall youth physical activity levels as a benefit of the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics. We further encourage evaluations of these efforts so the lessons learned can be documented, widely shared, and implemented for future major sporting events.

Authors’ contributions

BEA and JFS drafted and edited the manuscript equally. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.

Competing interests

Both authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Shanghai University of Sport.

References

1. Beijing Organising Committee for the 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Sustainability Plan. Available at: https://www.beijing2022.cn/a/20200515/003205.htm. [accessed 26.08.2021].

2. Vella SA, Swann C, Allen MS, Schweickle MJ, Magee CA. Bidirectional associations between sport involvement and mental health in adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:687–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. IOM (Institute of Medicine) In: Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment. Educating the student body: Taking physical activity and physical education to school. Kohl 3rd HW, Cook H, editors. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2013. Physical activity and physical education: Relationship to growth, development, and health; pp. 1–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Cadenas-Sánchez C, Estévez-López F, et al. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019;49:1383–1410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Jones-Palm DH, Palm J. Physical activity and its impact on health behavior among youth. Available at: https://www.icsspe.org/sites/default/files/PhysicalActivity.pdf. [accessed 26.08.2021].

6. Kulig K, Brener ND, McManus T. Sexual activity and substance use among adolescents by category of physical activity plus team sports participation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:905–912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. The Aspen Institute. Sport for all, play for life: A playbook to get every kid in the game. 2015. Available at: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Aspen-Institute-Project-Play-Report.pdf. [accessed 26.08.2021].

9. Weiss MR, Kipp LE, Reichter AP, Bolter ND. Evaluating girls on the run in promoting positive youth development: Group comparisons on life skills transfer and social processes. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2020;32:172–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:23–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Logan K, Cuff S. Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Organized sports for children, preadolescents, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2019;143 doi:10.1542/peds.2019-0997. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Katzmarzyk P, Malina R. Contribution of organized sports participation to estimated daily energy expenditure in youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1998;10:378–386. [Google Scholar]

13. Wickel EE, Eisenmann JC. Contribution of youth sport to total daily physical activity among 6- to 12-yr-old boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1493–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Marques A, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB. Associations between organized sports participation and objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and weight status in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:154–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Herbert JJ, Møller NC, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N. Organized sport participation is associated with higher levels of overall health-related physical activity in children (CHAMPS Study-DK) PLoS One. 2015;10 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134621. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Katzmarzyk P, Walker P, Malina R. A time-motion study of organized youth sports. J Hum Mov Stud. 2021;40:325–334. [Google Scholar]

17. Leek D, Carlson JA, Cain KL, et al. Physical activity during youth sports practices. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. The IOC Sport for All Commission. Get moving: The IOC Guide to Managing Sport for All Programs. Available at: https://www.sportanddev.org/sites/default/files/downloads/ioc_guide_get_moving_.pdf. [accessed 26.08.2021].

19. World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [accessed 26.08.2021].

20. World Health Organization. WHO and International Olympic Committee team up to improve health through sport. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-05-2020-who-and-international-olympic-committee-team-up-to-improve-health-through-sport. [accessed 26.08.2021].

21. Bauman AE, Kamada M, Reis RS, et al. An evidence-based assessment of the impact of the olympic games on population levels of physical activity. The Lancet. 2021;398:456–464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Craig CL, Bauman AE. The impact of the Vancouver Winter Olympics on population level physical activity and sport participation among canadian children and adolescents: Population based study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:107. doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0107-y. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Sport and Health Science are provided here courtesy of Shanghai University of Sport

The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics: An opportunity to promote physical activity and winter sports in Chinese youth (2024)

FAQs

What is unique about Beijing hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics? ›

Having won the bid for the 2022 Olympic Winter Games on 31 July 2015, Beijing became the first city in the world to have hosted both the summer and winter editions of the Olympic Games.

What was the impact of the Beijing Olympics? ›

However, the Games did not bring changes to the political system or to social structures in Chinese society. Nevertheless, it did give China the confidence to join the international sports community and gain rich experience to host the 2022 Winter Olympic Games in Beijing.

How did China do in the Winter Olympics? ›

The host nation China finished fourth with nine gold medals and also eleventh place by total medals won, marking its most successful performance in Winter Olympics history.

What did China spend on the 2022 Olympics? ›

Cost distribution of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games

The overall cost of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games is estimated to exceed 38.5 billion U.S. dollars, of which the majority was spent on infrastructure, a total of over 20 billion U.S. dollars.

Why were the Beijing Olympics important? ›

The Games helped China to portray a successful national brand image as an emerging global power with growing influence, despite some problem areas. Hosting the Games was a consequence of China's economic success, showcase of remarkable achievements, catalyst for Beijing's modernisation and signal for more business.

How did the 2022 Olympics affect Beijing? ›

81,000 job opportunities were created by the Games for those living near the venues. By the end of the 2024-2025 season: 520 million visitors are expected to participate in China's ice and snow leisure tourism. CNY 720 billion (USD 107 billion) in revenue is forecast.

Why is Beijing so important? ›

Beijing, the country's political and cultural centre for more than 700 years, has more buildings of historical and architectural significance than any other contemporary city in China. Since 1949 many new government and municipal buildings, combining both traditional and Western architecture, have been constructed.

What impact do the Olympics have? ›

The Olympics can bring a range of benefits and drawbacks to its host city. Countries and cities are often compelled to bid for the privilege of hosting the games, in hopes that it will stimulate the development of infrastructure, draw tourisms dollars, and boost employment.

How did the Olympics impact history? ›

The Ancient Olympic Games began in the 8th century BC in Greece, and immediately changed the Panhellenic world by creating a truce between cities who would just as soon weaponize a Trojan horse than call a time-out on their conflicts.

Was the Beijing Olympics a success? ›

IOC President Thomas Bach said, “The truly exceptional Olympic Winter Games Beijing 2022 were a showcase for incredible sporting performances, they broke ground as the most gender balanced Olympic Winter Games in history, and they attracted record new audiences.

Why is China so successful at Olympics? ›

China's massive economy and population have helped it take home more total medals than countries like Australia, Japan, and Canada, despite China having participated in only half the number of Olympic Games as these other wealthy countries.

Does Beijing get snow? ›

Does Beijing have snow? It does! Beijing doesn't get a lot of snow, and it tends to melt in a day or two. But the snowy days are often some of the prettiest days in Beijing.

Why did Beijing want to host the Olympics? ›

Hosting the Olympic Games was an important part of the strategy to make Chi na a sporting superpower, as well as a political and eco nomic power, that could compete on equal terms with the US in the West and Japan and South Korea in the East; Thus Beijing was a candidate city for the Games in 2000 and 2008.

What did China build for the Olympics? ›

The National Stadium (国家体育场), a.k.a Bird's Nest (鸟巢), is a stadium at Olympic Green in Chaoyang, Beijing, China. The National Stadium, covering an area of 204,000 square meters with 91,000 capacity, broke ground in December 2003, officially started construction in March 2004, and was completed in June 2008.

How much Olympics cost China? ›

Uncovering the hidden costs of the 2022 Beijing Olympics. Beijing says the cost of hosting the 2022 Winter Games is among the cheapest ever at $3.9 billion. But the real cost might be more than $38.5 billion.

What is unique about Beijing? ›

As an inhabited city, Beijing has over 3,000 years of history and is one of the oldest in the world! The city is six times older than New York. The historical artifacts around Beijing are ancient: the Great Wall was built in the Qin Dynasty (221-207 BCE).

What makes the Special Olympics unique? ›

In Special Olympics, the power and joy of sport, shifts focus to what our athletes CAN do, not what they can't. Attention to disabilities fades away. Instead, we see our athletes' talents and abilities—and applaud them for all that they can do. And they are doing a lot—from gymnastics to soccer to open-water swimming.

What is the theme of Beijing Olympics 2022? ›

Theme and concept

The themes of the opening ceremony are: China's yearning for and willingness to pursue world peace. Olympic motto "faster, higher, stronger – together" Beijing Winter Games' slogan of "Together for a shared future"

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 5843

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.